<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Credidam &#187; Judicial News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?cat=14&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en</link>
	<description>My WordPress Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 20:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.17</generator>
	<item>
		<title>HCCJ rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX against the civil court decision dated the 19th of June 2013</title>
		<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=504</link>
		<comments>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=504#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 09:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the 06th of March 2015, in docket no. 1536/2/2013, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the civil court decision dated the 19th of June 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal rejected the suspension of decision no. 152/2012 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (whereby CREDIDAM (Romanian Center for Performers’ Rights Management) was designated as the collector for the TV phonograms source). Click to see: Decizion No 1021-06.03.2015]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On the 06<sup>th</sup> of March 2015, in docket no. 1536/2/2013, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the civil court decision dated the 19<sup>th</sup> of June 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal rejected the suspension of decision no. 152/2012 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (whereby CREDIDAM (Romanian Center for Performers’ Rights Management) was designated as the collector for the TV phonograms source).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Click to see: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Decizion-No-1021-06.03.2015.doc">Decizion No 1021-06.03.2015</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?feed=rss2&#038;p=504</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HCCJ rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX against the Civil Judgment no. 3131/17th of October 2013</title>
		<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=502</link>
		<comments>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=502#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 09:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the 30th of January 2015, in docket no. 2768/2/2013 (wherein the collective management body CREDIDAM (Romanian Center for Performers’ Rights Management) acted as intervener), rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 3131/17th of October 2013 (and against the court decision dated the 12th of September 2013). By the aforementioned Judgment, the Bucharest Court of Appeal ordered the cancellation of decision no. 5/2013 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office), whereby ORDA had granted to ARAIEX a deadline for compliance with the law. Click to see: Decizion No 351-30.01.2015]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On the 30th of January 2015, in docket no. 2768/2/2013 (wherein the collective management body CREDIDAM (Romanian Center for Performers’ Rights Management) acted as intervener), rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 3131/17th of October 2013 (and against the court decision dated the 12th of September 2013). By the aforementioned Judgment, the Bucharest Court of Appeal ordered the cancellation of decision no. 5/2013 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office), whereby ORDA had granted to ARAIEX a deadline for compliance with the law.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Click to see: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Decizion-No-351-30.01.2015.doc">Decizion No 351-30.01.2015</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?feed=rss2&#038;p=502</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HCCJ rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX against the Civil Judgment no. 2222/02nd of July 2013</title>
		<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=500</link>
		<comments>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=500#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 09:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the 23rd of January 2015, in docket no. 476/2/2013 (docket wherein CREDIDAM (Romanian Center for Performers’ Rights Management) acted as intervener), rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 2222/02nd of July 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal ordered the cancellation of decision no. 199/2012 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office). Click to see: 0721_0012]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On the 23rd of January 2015, in docket no. 476/2/2013 (docket wherein CREDIDAM (Romanian Center for Performers’ Rights Management) acted as intervener), rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 2222/02nd of July 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal ordered the cancellation of decision no. 199/2012 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Click to see: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/0721_0012.doc">0721_0012</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?feed=rss2&#038;p=500</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HCCJ rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX against the Civil Judgment no. 793/21st of February 2013</title>
		<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=498</link>
		<comments>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=498#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 09:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear members, On the 15th of January 2015, in docket no. 5036/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 793/21st of February 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal cancelled the second decision of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) issued for the radio source (respectively decision no. 37/2012 of ORDA). Click to see: 0671_001]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Dear members,</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On the 15<sup>th</sup> of January 2015, in docket no. 5036/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 793/21<sup>st</sup> of February 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal cancelled the second decision of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) issued for the radio source (respectively decision no. 37/2012 of ORDA).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Click to see:<span style="color: #0000ff;"> <a style="color: #0000ff;" href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/0671_001.doc">0671_001</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?feed=rss2&#038;p=498</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HCCJ rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX against the Civil Judgment no. 822/25th of February 2013</title>
		<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=496</link>
		<comments>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=496#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 09:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear members, On the 14th of November 2014, in docket no. 5991/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 822/25th of February 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal cancelled the last of the three decisions of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) issued for the radio source (respectively decision no. 57/2012 of ORDA). Click to see: 0275_001]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Dear members,<br />
On the 14th of November 2014, in docket no. 5991/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 822/25th of February 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal cancelled the last of the three decisions of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) issued for the radio source (respectively decision no. 57/2012 of ORDA).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Click to see: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/0275_001.doc">0275_001</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?feed=rss2&#038;p=496</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HCCJ rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX against the Civil Judgment no. 5570/05th of October 2012</title>
		<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=494</link>
		<comments>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=494#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 09:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear members, On the 11th of December 2014, in docket no. 2447/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 5570/2012, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal cancelled decision no. 305/2011 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (decision whereby the collection pertaining to the public communication / ambient source was transferred from CREDIDAM (Romanian Center for Performers’ Rights Management) to ARAIEX). Click to see: 0451_001]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Dear members,</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On the 11<sup>th</sup> of December 2014, in docket no. 2447/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 5570/2012, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal cancelled decision no. 305/2011 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (decision whereby the collection pertaining to the public communication / ambient source was transferred from CREDIDAM (Romanian Center for Performers’ Rights Management) to ARAIEX).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Click to see: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/0451_001.doc">0451_001</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?feed=rss2&#038;p=494</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HCCJ rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX against the Civil Judgment no. 7245/21st of December 2012</title>
		<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=492</link>
		<comments>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=492#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 09:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear members, On the 12th of November 2014, in docket no. 4025/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 7245/21st of December 2012, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal cancelled the three decisions of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (no. 11/2012, ORDA no. 39 /2012 and no. 56/2012, issued for the ambient source). Click to see: 0268_001]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Dear members,</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On the 12<sup>th</sup> of November 2014, in docket no. 4025/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 7245/21<sup>st</sup> of December 2012, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal cancelled the three decisions of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (no. 11/2012, ORDA no. 39 /2012 and no. 56/2012, issued for the ambient source).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Click to see: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/0268_001.doc">0268_001</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?feed=rss2&#038;p=492</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The justice ruled: CREDIDAM remains the sole collector for cable</title>
		<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=490</link>
		<comments>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=490#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 09:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the 03rd of July 2014, in docket no. 7655/2/2013 – trial won by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania), the Bucharest Court of Appeal, Administrative and Fiscal Contentious Section rejected as unfounded the request filed by ARAIEX for the cancellation of decisions no. 120/20th of September 2013 and 121/20th of September 2013 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (based on the two decisions mentioned above, CREDIDAM (Romanian Center for Performers’ Rights Management) was designated as the sole collector of the remunerations owed to performers and/or players from the cable – phonogram and audiovisual source). Click to see: Cancellation Decizion No 120 &#8211; 20-09-2013]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On the 03<sup>rd</sup> of July 2014, in docket no. 7655/2/2013 – trial won by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania), the Bucharest Court of Appeal, Administrative and Fiscal Contentious Section rejected as unfounded the request filed by ARAIEX for the cancellation of decisions no. 120/20<sup>th</sup> of September 2013 and 121/20<sup>th</sup> of September 2013 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (based on the two decisions mentioned above, CREDIDAM (Romanian Center for Performers’ Rights Management) was designated as the sole collector of the remunerations owed to performers and/or players from the cable – phonogram and audiovisual source).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Click to see: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Cancellation-Decizion-No-120-20-09-2013.doc">Cancellation Decizion No 120 &#8211; 20-09-2013</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?feed=rss2&#038;p=490</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HCCJ rejected the appeal whereby ARAIEX had been designated as the collector for the radio source</title>
		<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=488</link>
		<comments>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=488#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 09:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the 26th of June 2014, in docket no. 3694/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 655/12th of February 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal ordered the cancellation of Decision no. 10/03rd of February 2012 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (designating ARAIEX as the collector for the radio source). Click to see: 4294_001]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On the 26<sup>th</sup> of June 2014, in docket no. 3694/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 655/12<sup>th</sup> of February 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal ordered the cancellation of Decision no. 10/03<sup>rd</sup> of February 2012 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (designating ARAIEX as the collector for the radio source).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Click to see: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/4294_001.doc">4294_001</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?feed=rss2&#038;p=488</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HCCJ irrevocably rejected the appeal to the judgment whereby the remunerations from private copy were transferred by the sole collector UPFR to ARAIEX</title>
		<link>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=486</link>
		<comments>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=486#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 09:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judicial News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the 04th of June 2014, in docket no. 6472/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 1457/24th of April 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal ordered the cancellation of Decision no. 62/2012 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (whereby the remunerations from private copy were transferred by the sole collector UPFR (Union of Phonogram Producers in Romania) to ARAIEX). Click to see: 4131_001]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">On the 04<sup>th</sup> of June 2014, in docket no. 6472/2/2012, the High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal filed by ARAIEX (Artists’ Association of Romania) against the Civil Judgment no. 1457/24<sup>th</sup> of April 2013, whereby the Bucharest Court of Appeal ordered the cancellation of Decision no. 62/2012 of ORDA (Romanian Copyright Office) (whereby the remunerations from private copy were transferred by the sole collector UPFR (Union of Phonogram Producers in Romania) to ARAIEX).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Click to see: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="http://credidam.ro/wp-en/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/4131_001.doc">4131_001</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://credidam.ro/wp-en/?feed=rss2&#038;p=486</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
